E-mail: woras.geo@yahoo.com Back To Current Topics
 
My Disagreements With US Diving
Serve As Reasons Why I Have Discontinued My Membership.

                The following represent some of the reasons why I am no longer a member of US Diving. While pondering and weighing the pros and cons of membership, I came to the conclusion that the list of cons was far larger than the pros, thus the justification for my decision. What I tried to do below was list the cons from both the coach's and diver's perspective. While reading the lists, keep in mind that membership like mine is for summers only. In my area, that season lasts almost 6 weeks.
 

From A Coach's Perspective.
From An Age Group Diver's Perspective.
  1. Membership is too expensive for what is given in return.
  2. Freedom to choose what is best for my program has
      been taken away.
  3. Most opportunities have turned to mandates.
  4. Certification has taken the place of Education.
  5. Too much time and expense to become Safety Certified.
      The test didn't change the 3 or 4 times I took it. Some
      items on the test were not coaching related or didn't
      apply to many coaches that didn't have the availability of 
      the equipment referred to on the test. 
  6. Additional Red Cross certifications are unnecessary for
      those who have to have a lifeguard on duty.
  7. As a paying member, I am not allowed to vote.
  8. The organization is set up for the elite senior finalists and 
      their coaches.
  9. The primary focus is on winning International Gold
      Medals.
10. Age Group requirements seem to be set by coaches that
      don't even coach at that level.
11. What good are those requirements when divers lose
      interest in the sport at a very young age?
12. Too much money being spent on training centers when
      the idea hasn't gone over very well and funding questions
      still remain unanswered.
13. Since the LRP has surfaced, I would be held accountable
      for ownership in a process that I can not accept. That 
      makes the Mission Statement confusing to me.
14. In the past the organization was not successful helping
      various coaches get equipment installed in their facilities.
15. Blame has been placed on coaches like me for the USA's
      lack of International Gold Medals and I don't even coach
      at that level. That logic eludes me.
16. I have lost faith, confidence and trust in the National
      Governing Board.
  1. Membership fees too expensive for a couple of summer
      meets. This doesn't include travel expenses or meet
      fees.
  2. No discounts for multi-diver families.
  3. Skill level requirements are too difficult for the younger
      ages.
  4. The option of choice for the diver is limited.
  5. Young divers can only choose from a limited, selected 
      dive list.
  6. Divers want to learn how to do different dives and not be
      drilled in a form of dive-arobics or skill progressions.
  7. Dives on that list have dd's that aren't the same as in the
      dive charts for all other divers.
  8. This question is often asked: "Why don't the older divers 
       have to do a back or reverse dives tuck?"
  9. At 14 a diver can select any dive from the tables. This 
      apparently means that they have mastered all of the skills
      taught previously. It is also the age where many begin the 
      awkward physical stage in their growth development.
10. The activity and coaches are too serious. Where's the
      fun?
11. I'm not good enough yet to go to Regionals, my season is
      over.
12. I can't practice because my coach left for a meet with our
      better divers.
13. Young divers want to dive in High School. Why would 
      they want to join US Diving? The same rules don't apply.
14. High School divers want to dive in College. Why would
      they want to join US Diving?
15. If they are not a Junior or Senior elite diver, why should 
      any diver join US Diving?

                Articles on this site were written to inform US Diving people that there are problems when trying to institute programs such as the LRP. There are many unforeseen consequences. Unfortunately those consequences occur at the grass root and age group levels. This is why I have continued to argue over the last 3 1/2 years.
                There were times that points were made with some sarcasm. That was purposely done to emphasize a particular point. There were also times that I may have been well off the mark. That happened because the information I had was either incorrect or sketchy. In any case, the articles on this site represent my feelings of what transpired over these few years. I have voiced my opinion which was the original objective and am happy I did even with the lack of success I apparently had.
             I may have made a mistake in emphasizing the grass roots level since it seems to have been defined as entry level diving. This would be the lesson stage prior to enrolling in the Junior program. However, I was referring to the Junior program on down to the recreational swims. I believe that this is the grass roots of diving. Many kids get exposed to diving in lessons and go on that same summer to compete at the Association and maybe Regional levels. The newly exposed diver rarely makes it to Zones.
                I have changed my program objective to find divers for the local high schools. I have found a few kids who have learned 11 dives 2 years prior to entering high school. It will be interesting to see their progress over the next few years. They appear to be enthusiastic because of the success with the number of dives they have learned. They also appear to be looking forward to diving in high school. I don't believe that their skills would be any different if they were involved in US Diving. In any case, they will have more actual experience with dives they will need in order to compete at the high school level.
                At this point, I'm not sure what to do because most of this has fallen on deaf ears. This endeavor has lasted over 3 years and may be coming to an end in June 2001 when I retire. 4 to 8 years is projected by some before we see the type of changes I have been advocating. If those changes can be made, why would it take that long to make them?
Back To Current Topics